Charging Session, Ghislaine Maxwell Trial
Counsel met with Judge Nathan to go through the charging documents to be read for the jury on Monday, December 20th 2021
CHARGING SESSION
Today the Charging Session began at 9am in the Southern District of New York for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial; Maxwell is currently on trial for assisting, facilitating, and contributing to Jeffrey Epstein's sexual exploitation of multiple minor girls. Many requests for a call-in line and public access to sealed documents have been sent into the court but they have not yet been addressed at this time. We continue to see documents uploaded to CourtListener.com; motions filed by the Government or the Defense, and correspondence between the Court and the parties, but still no mention of these requests even being received. Regarding the requests, @InnerCityPress mentioned on Twitter, “…Inner City Press challenge still not docketed. Judge today says she only dockets things she acts on, making them "judicial documents." Thus, public will never know requests that get denied, and they can't be appealed”.
To end the day yesterday, Day 12, the Defense rested their case. The Government said their closing statement will be 2-3 hours long with a rebuttal of 45 minutes. Maxwell's lawyers said their closing argument will not be longer than the Government’s. Judge Nathan scheduled the charging conference and then told the jurors, “..you'll hear closing arguments then I'll instruct you on the law and you'll begin deliberations. Monday, I ask we start 9 am. And it's possible we'll go to 6”.
Maxwell was officially charged with:
· One count of enticement of a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts, in which Ms. Maxwell is accused of coercing one girl — identified as Minor Victim 1 in charging documents — to travel from Florida to New York, between 1994 and 1997, to engage in sex acts with Mr. Epstein.
· One count of transportation of a minor with intent to engage in illegal sex acts, which accuses Ms. Maxwell of bringing the same girl from Florida to New York on numerous occasions.
· One count of sex trafficking of a minor, which charges that between 2001 and 2004, Ms. Maxwell recruited, enticed and transported another girl — identified in the charges as Minor Victim 4 — to engage in at least one commercial sex act with Mr. Epstein
· And three counts of conspiracy, which are related to the other counts. The conspiracy counts in the indictment are more expansive, involving all four accusers and homes in the United States and in London. These charges involve accusations that Ms. Maxwell worked with Mr. Epstein to secure underage girls for sex acts, for example, by encouraging one to give Mr. Epstein massages in London between 1994 and 1995.
DIALOGUE FROM THE CHARGING SESSION
Provided by @InnerCityPress on Twitter: https://twitter.com/innercitypress
Judge Nathan: I have distributed my draft charge. Now we will discuss it.
Maxwell's lawyer, Everdell: We say foreign commerce should be excluded. There's no evidence in the record about Ms. Maxwell enticing Virginia Roberts, only of Roberts enticing Carolyn.
AUSA: We're OK with removing foreign commerce from Counts 1-4.
[Note: Ghislaine Maxwell is here, sitting in the corner as ever with two (female) U.S. Marshals behind her, today in g[reen] sweater.]
Judge Nathan: Mr. Everdell, help me find each "foreign commerce."
Maxwell's lawyer Everdell: Annie and Kate are not victims of this conspiracy.
Judge Nathan: That's why there was a different limiting instruction.
Everdell: Traveling from Arizona to New Mexico did not have its object violating New York law.
Maxwell’s Lawyer, Everdell: Page 16, line 2 - also change that.
Judge Nathan: I will.
Everdell: Let's take out the word "minor," it creates a lot of ambiguity.
Everdell: We want it to say that Count 4 relates solely to Jane. With respect to Kate, there was no violation of New York law - she was above the age of consent. And Annie, whatever she may be claiming in New Mexico, there was no violation of law. [So only Jane]
AUSA: You're conflating the conspiracy and the substantive counts.
Judge Nathan: The [defense] objection is overruled. Page 15 adding "solely" between "relates" and the world "to." That is, "relates SOLELY to" Jane.
Judge Nathan: let's say, "individuals under the age of 18."
[Visual update: upon further reflecting, Maxwell's sweater may be green. Her brother in the front row of the gallery takes down his mask, takes swig of bottled water]
[Update: Maxwell's brother, reading from a cell phone, puts his mask back up.]
Everdell: We'd like to omit another "or foreign"
Judge Nathan: Done.
Everdell: We object to the word coerced, we'd like it removed.
[Bobbi Sternheim come from front table back to where Everdell is, next to Maxwell, and whispers in his ear, pointing at Judge Nathan's charge. A copy of a case is handed to AUSA Rohrbach]
Everdell: I can get you a typewritten proposed instruction, like the one given by Judge Rakoff in US v. Miller.
[Pause while Judge Nathan and AUSA Rohrbach and AUSA Maurene Comey read the case they've been handed]
[Judge Nathan returns with a Federal Appendix case found by "my crack law clerks." It seems the 2d Circuit, to which Judge Nathan aspires, permits two different charges on "one dominant purpose."]
Everdell: Page 24, we want it to say "Ms Maxwell" not "the defendant"
Everdell: We want the word "solely" on line 12.
Judge Nathan: Done. And I'll strike "and foreign" on page 25.
Everdell: There, we also object to the use of the language of the statute - we want a bracket.
Judge Nathan: I spent an inordinate amount of time on this
Everdell: here it says "between the US and a foreign country." That should be out.
AUSA: Fine.
[Note: Now it's Menninger huddling in the corner with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is speaking with her hands - whispering through mask but gesticulating]
Everdell: In the title, we'd like to change minor to person under 18.
AUSA: The indictment says "minor." But we are not seeking to send the indictment back with the jury.
Judge Nathan: So you are in vigorous agreement.
[Laughter among lawyers.]
[Note: Maxwell's lawyer Menninger has picked up her bag and coat and she's left the courtroom. Everdell is running the show on the jury charge, vs AUSA Rohrbach (though AUSA's Lara Pomeratz and Maurene Comey taking and passing copious notes)]
Everdell: With respect to Jane, we want to use the word "alleges." And here, we'd like you to simply eliminate the reference to age.
AUSA: We can remove age, let the jury decide Annie's age.
Everdell: We preserve our objection with respect to the topless massage.
[Maxell's lawyer Bobbi Sternheim jumps in and gets a change. By contrast AUSA Lara Pomerantz passes a note to AUSA Maurene Comey, who reads it and passes it on to AUSA Rohrback, who's doing the speaking]
AUSA Rohrback: We're OK to cut "including at times Maxwell."
Judge Nathan: So we're taking Kate out of the overt acts. And, let's take a break.
[This one is not for the jury - they're not here today]
Everdell: We want the "conscious avoidance" language out. The record shows people saying their ages. I need to break this into 2 pieces. There was testimony about multiple females being at the Palm Beach residence. But what ages did they look like?
Everdell: Mr. Alessi said he only saw two people who looked under age. Jane says she was 14 or 15 and we say no, she was older. Carolyn says, I was such and such age. But we say we made nothing to do with Carolyn.
Everdell: Maybe Mr. Epstein slipped in a couple of teenagers.
AUSA: Carolyn was told to say she was 18.
Everdell: Carolyn was told by *Virginia* to say she was 18. That doesn't have anything to do with Ms. Maxwell.
Judge Nathan: We're going to include it. Wait, I have a comment on my own draft. The "he" should be replaced with "she."
Everdell: There were witnesses with felony convictions. We'd like the Sand instruction on the credibility of witnesses.
AUSA: We're not aware of this instruction being given in this District.
Judge Nathan: I haven't given that instruction.
Everdell: Maybe on cooperators?
Judge Nathan: Looks like I have give it as a separate instruction, in US v. Berry
Everdell: We want the instruction that US but not the defense can offer immunity. One of our witnesses said they would invoke the Fifth.
AUSA: Virginia Robert could have been called by the defense –
Defense: I'm not referring to her. I'm referring to Sarah Kellen
AUSA Rohrback: We don't want in closing the argument about the empty chair and why the government is prosecuting.
Everdell: Let's turn to the verdict sheet. Take out the word minor, put in "individuals under the age of 17."
Judge Nathan: OK.
AUSA: We have one nit. Where it's supposed to be, Mark your verdict with a check mark, you actually use a "T" in parenthesis.
Judge Nathan (laughs) I don't know how that got in there. We'll fix it.
Judge Nathan: This should be a two hour closing.
AUSA Comey: But we have exhibits. So two and a half.
Judge Nathan: Can you do thirty for the rebuttal?
AUSA Comey: I'd ask for the court's indulgence for more
Judge Nathan: Thirty five minutes.
[So 5 hours and 35 minutes and the charge, short lunch, Judge says]
Judge Nathan: The charge is 80 pages. My favorite part of the job, reading the charge (laughs). It should take an hour.
[So 6 hours and 35 minutes, plus breaks and lunch - can fit between 9 am and 6 pm, on Monday.]
AUSA Maurene Comey: To keep things confidential, during closings some exhibits will only be on the jurors' screen, not the public screen. We'll also turn the podium.
Judge Nathan: I will work on finalizing the charge.
[But will it go into the docket?]
Addendum: Maxwell stayed in the courtroom after some others left. Finally the two Marshal escorted her toward the prisoners' door - she stopped on the way and exchanged words with her brother, then continue to the door.